Филолог заявил о массовой отмене обращения на «вы» с большой буквы09:36
第一百零二条 为了查明案件事实，确定违反治安管理行为人、被侵害人的某些特征、伤害情况或者生理状态，需要对其人身进行检查，提取或者采集肖像、指纹信息和血液、尿液等生物样本的，经公安机关办案部门负责人批准后进行。对已经提取、采集的信息或者样本，不得重复提取、采集。提取或者采集被侵害人的信息或者样本，应当征得被侵害人或者其监护人同意。
。同城约会是该领域的重要参考
Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Раскрыты подробности похищения ребенка в Смоленске09:27